Compliance executes here.
Authorization packages built on assertion fail under 3PAO scrutiny. REAEGIS derives compliance posture from system state — scan results, control implementations, change records, and signed evidence. When the system changes, the posture updates. The AO is always reviewing current fact, not historical documentation.
Supports FedRAMP Rev 5, CMMC 2.0 (32 CFR Part 170), NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, DoD RMF, and IL2 through IL5. Air-gapped deployment available.
The authorization lifecycle broken into five discrete functions. Each engine operates independently. Together they close the loop from push to signed evidence package.
Evaluation engine.
Eleven compliance gates evaluated on every push to a connected repository. No schedule. No human trigger. Gates map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, FedRAMP KSIs, and CMMC practices. PASS, FAIL, WARN, or SKIP — with specific control references and signed evidence.
Remediation intelligence.
When a gate fails, remediation plans are generated and routed through the CCB workflow required by NIST SP 800-53 CM-3. Separation of duties enforced at the data layer. Approver cannot be the initiator. Every step signed and logged to CHRONICLE.
Control classification.
Every control in the program baseline classified as automated, manual, or inherited. Status derived from connected system data. Supports NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 all families, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 and Rev 3, FedRAMP Low through High baselines.
Continuous monitoring.
Monitoring jobs execute on defined schedules: vulnerability database sync, SBOM delta analysis, POA&M milestone tracking, IAVA compliance, KSI validation, and ConMon package generation. Required by NIST SP 800-137 and FedRAMP ConMon guidance.
Immutable audit.
Every event cryptographically signed using Cosign and anchored to the Sigstore Rekor transparency log. The audit record cannot be altered retroactively. Verifiable by any party with the public key. Satisfies the evidentiary standard for Inspector General review and FCA proceedings.
Six compliance gaps that surface at contract award. Not after.
Your SPRS score is not your NIST score.
The Supplier Performance Risk System score is computed from the DoD NIST SP 800-171 Assessment Methodology — weighted deductions per practice, range -203 to +110. Prime contractors use minimum score thresholds as pre-qualification criteria before the technical evaluation begins. Annual senior official affirmation is required under DFARS 252.204-7021. False affirmation is FCA exposure under 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733.
Learn moreSeptember 30, 2026. All providers.
RFC-0024 mandates machine-readable OSCAL authorization packages for every FedRAMP provider — not only 20x participants. Providers who cannot produce OSCAL-formatted assessment packages by this date do not maintain FedRAMP authorization status. Static SSP narrative does not satisfy the requirement.
Learn moreA pentest report is not CA-8 evidence.
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 CA-8 requires penetration testing with documented results tracked to remediation closure. C3PAO assessors evaluate whether findings from penetration tests have been resolved and whether the resolution is verifiable. A PDF report with no systematic remediation tracking does not satisfy the control assessment objective for CA-8.
Learn moreDFARS 252.204-7021(c) runs downstream.
Prime contractors must flow CMMC requirements to subcontractors handling FCI or CUI. A prime who cannot document subcontractor compliance is in violation regardless of their own certification status. The liability does not stay with the sub.
Learn moreRev 2 SSPs need a formal crosswalk.
NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3 published May 2024 restructures requirements from 110 practices to 97 requirements with 88 Organization-Defined Parameters. DoD has published defined ODP values — including a 10-year minimum for identifier reuse (IA family). Programs built on Rev 2 require a documented crosswalk, gap analysis, and SSP update.
Learn moreNo AI exemption exists under CMMC.
An AI tool with access to a system that processes, stores, or transmits CUI is subject to NIST SP 800-171 access control, audit logging, and incident response requirements in full. OMB M-25-21 imposes AI governance and risk assessment obligations for federal contractors using AI in government work. OMB M-26-04 addresses LLM procurement. Unassessed AI tools in CUI environments create FCA exposure when CMMC attestations are submitted.
Learn moreCompliance is manual. Delivery is continuous. The gap is the risk.
Existing tools are either systems of record that require manual data entry, or detection tools that generate alerts without generating authorization evidence. The missing function is automated conversion of DevSecOps activity into compliance evidence. That is REAEGIS.
Evidence is copied into eMASS by hand
ISSOs spend 73 percent of their time manually moving evidence into the system of record — 40 hours per system, every ConMon cycle. The work is real. The toil is not.
ATO packages age the moment they are signed
Pipelines ship 47 commits a day while authorization rests on a 14-month-old snapshot. There is no traceability between a code commit and the NIST control it satisfies.
Findings are detected but never become evidence
Critical CVEs stay open 67 days on average before remediation is verified. Detection tools raise alerts — they do not generate authorization evidence, and the gap never closes itself.
Five engines. From commit to authorization.
REAEGIS is not a collection of point tools. Every engine shares the same control baseline, the same evidence model, and the same immutable audit chain.
Designed for accountability at every step
Compliance is not a report REAEGIS produces at the end. It is the architecture underneath every deployment.
from 18 months — the first package is available within weeks of deployment
of ISSO review time per monthly cycle, down from 40 hours of manual eMASS entry
for developers to learn — code keeps flowing through existing repos and pipelines
SaaS, FedRAMP High, self-hosted IL4/IL5, and true air-gapped environments
From finding to verified fix, with proof at every step
Scanners produce signals. REAEGIS produces authorization evidence. A CVE only closes when Scan 4 confirms it is absent from the running production environment — not when a ticket says so.
Code ships
A developer pushes code, CI/CD runs, a container image is built. Nothing about the workflow changes.
Scanners report
Grype, Syft, OpenSCAP, SonarQube, Snyk, or ACAS/Nessus produce results. REAEGIS treats them as signal providers.
RAMPART decides
The result is evaluated against 9 security gates. The pipeline continues, warns, or blocks — and the decision is evidence.
AXIOM maps
Findings are mapped to the applicable NIST 800-53 baseline and system boundary. Control status updates in real time.
ADVERSARIUS remediates
A remediation plan, merge request, patch bundle, or hardening script is generated — tied to the exact control violated.
CHRONICLE records
Every event, artifact hash, tool version, and decision is signed and anchored to the Rekor transparency log.
PHAROS verifies
A finding is not closed until the running production artifact is confirmed clean. Drift reopens it automatically.
Evidence accrues
OSCAL artifacts, POA&M updates, ConMon reports, and authorization posture — generated, not assembled.
Built for the teams closest to authorization risk
Defense Contractors
CMMC 2.0 / NIST 800-171CMMC assessment readiness with practice-level evidence mapping, continuous control monitoring, and POA&M-ready findings.
Federal Agencies
FedRAMP / NIST 800-53FedRAMP authorization workflows with OSCAL-compatible documentation, continuous monitoring, and CyberScope-formatted FISMA metrics.
Regulated Enterprises
ISO 27001 / SOC 2Multi-framework compliance with unified evidence collection, audit cycle management, and one shared audit chain.
Authorization is not a destination.
It is a system property.
REAEGIS is the infrastructure that maintains it — converting every commit, scan, and approval into evidence your Authorizing Official can act on.