PHAROS
Maintain auditable visibility into compliance posture and operational drift. Posture is measured against the control baseline continuously — not reconstructed at the next assessment cycle.
Compliance status is only known at audit time
Drift goes undetected until assessors find it. Stakeholders lack visibility into security posture between assessments. PHAROS monitors the running system against the active control baseline, detects configuration drift the moment a previously passing control begins failing, and keeps ConMon evidence current after every release — so the monthly cycle is a review, not an excavation.
PHAROS exists to observe compliance — not assume it.
What it does
Posture dashboards
Compliance visualized across controls, projects, and frameworks from live data.
- ·Control-family rollups
- ·Per-system authorization posture
- ·Seven-factor ATO readiness score
Drift detection
Alerts when systems deviate from compliant baselines — before an assessor notices.
- ·Baseline vs. current state comparison
- ·Previously passing controls reopened on failure
- ·Remediation triggered automatically
Role-based views
Each stakeholder sees posture at their altitude.
- ·Executive summaries for AOs
- ·Technical detail for ISSOs
- ·Read-only auditor views for 3PAO / SCA-V
Trend analysis
Remediation velocity and compliance trajectory over time, not snapshots.
- ·Posture history per control
- ·Remediation cycle-time tracking
- ·Cross-cycle comparison
POA&M engine
Findings tracked from open to verified-closed with full accountability.
- ·Milestones, due dates, and owners
- ·Residual risk tracking
- ·Closure requires verified evidence
ConMon report generator
Monthly continuous-monitoring deliverables, generated rather than assembled.
- ·Recurring reporting packages
- ·eMASS-formatted CSV export
- ·OSCAL assessment outputs
Step-by-step lifecycle
- 01Scheduler runsPeriodic scans, posture refresh jobs, and ConMon cycles execute on schedule — or on demand when an ISSO needs a current picture.
- 02Collectors gather postureRuntime collectors pull cloud, Kubernetes, container, host, and application state; sync workers import updated scanner results.
- 03Drift engine comparesCurrent state is evaluated against the approved baseline and expected configuration. Deviations become findings.
- 04POA&M updatesFindings are tracked with milestones, owners, due dates, and residual risk. Nothing closes without closure evidence.
- 05Reports generateThe ConMon generator produces the monthly package and OSCAL assessment results; dashboards update for every role.
A monthly ConMon cycle, without the 40 hours
The cycle closes with evidence already in place. The ISSO reviews exceptions, exports the eMASS file, and imports it in minutes — instead of copying evidence by hand for a week.
Illustrative example. Not real customer data.
What PHAROS generates
- Assurance reports for auditors
- Executive compliance summaries
- Continuous monitoring dashboards
- eMASS-formatted ConMon exports
- OSCAL assessment results
- POA&M status with closure evidence
PHAROS observes what RAMPART enforces and AXIOM defines.
A finding is not closed until the deployed artifact is verified as remediated in the running environment. Posture is measured, never assumed — and never self-reported.
One closed loop
Authorization is not a destination.
It is a system property.
REAEGIS is the infrastructure that maintains it — converting every commit, scan, and approval into evidence your Authorizing Official can act on.
